Council Tax Precept Consultation
Background
The legal requirements for council tax increases are primarily governed by the Local Government Finance Act 1992, as amended by the Localism Act 2011. A consultation with the public was launched on 11 December 2025 for a £5 increase in the council tax precept for the year ahead. The consultation ended at 5pm on 4 February 2026, the results are set out below.
The consultation was promoted during the period through a variety of channels:
· Seven articles were published in the media with an opportunity to see of 17.2 million.
· Featured in Hot Topics and Prevention Matters stakeholder newsletters and 351 key stakeholders emailed directly.
· Details were sent to 84,572 subscribers of our In The Know public e-newsletter.
· Social media posts reached 73,939 people.
· Community groups were engaged by community fire safety officer with some paper surveys completed.
· Promoted internally on the Service’s intranet and staff newsletter.
Appendix one of this report also contains the Fire Brigade Union response to the budget.
Analysis of the budget consultation – February 2026
Level of support |
Numbers |
Percentage |
|
Strongly support |
576 |
59% |
|
Support |
160 |
16% |
|
Neither support nor oppose |
54 |
6% |
|
Oppose |
48 |
5% |
|
Strongly oppose |
124 |
13% |
|
Don’t know |
8 |
0% |
Positive Sentiment
A strong majority of comments express clear support for Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service, recognising its essential, life‑saving role and the need to maintain high standards of emergency response. Many respondents emphasise that the proposed increase is modest, reasonable, or “worth every penny.” Examples include:
These comments demonstrate widespread appreciation for the work of firefighters and a willingness to financially support the continuity of services.
Negative Sentiment
A substantial minority of comments reflect concerns about the financial burden on households, particularly during the ongoing cost of living crisis. These respondents often feel that council tax is already too high or increasing too frequently, and some express frustration about perceived inefficiencies or unnecessary spending. Others oppose the principle of raising local taxes instead of using central government funding. Representative comments include:
There is also a cluster of comments criticising equality and diversity spending or the inclusion of equality questions in the survey, which contributes to negative sentiment.
Neutral Sentiment
A smaller proportion of respondents take a neutral or conditional stance. These comments often seek additional information, express uncertainty about the cumulative impact of future rises, or state that support depends on how the funding is allocated.
Examples include:
Neutral comments frequently request reassurance around transparency and efficiency.
Percentage Breakdown
Overall Summary
Overall, there is strong support for Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service, with many residents recognising the essential role it plays in protecting lives and expressing willingness to contribute financially to sustain its performance. However, concerns also exist around the broader affordability of council tax, value for money, and perceived inefficiencies in spending. The inclusion of equality related questions appears to have increased some negative sentiment.
Sentiment patterns captured through social media responses broadly match those obtained through the direct consultation channels. Please note, respondents do not have to answer the equalities questions to take part in the consultation but it helps the Service understand if we are talking to all parts of the community.
Status |
Number |
Percentage |
|
A Lancashire resident |
923 |
99% |
|
A Lancashire business owner |
5 |
0.5% |
|
An employee of Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service |
16 |
2% |
|
A representative of a partner organisation |
3 |
0.5% |
|
Public representative such as councillor or MP. |
9 |
1% |
|
None of the above |
9 |
1% |
District |
Number |
Percentage |
|
Blackburn with Darwen |
78 |
8% |
|
Blackpool |
106 |
11% |
|
Burnley |
80 |
8% |
|
Chorley |
75 |
8% |
|
Fylde |
67 |
7% |
|
Hyndburn |
44 |
5% |
|
Lancaster |
94 |
10% |
|
Pendle |
34 |
4% |
|
Preston |
95 |
10% |
|
South Ribble |
75 |
8% |
|
Ribble Valley |
33 |
3% |
|
Rossendale |
42 |
4% |
|
West Lancashire |
63 |
7% |
|
Wyre |
80 |
8% |
Gender |
Number |
Percentage |
|
Male |
400 |
42% |
|
Female |
492 |
52% |
|
Prefer not to say |
62 |
6% |
|
Gender |
Number |
Percentage |
|
Male |
397 |
42% |
|
Female |
486 |
51% |
|
Non-binary |
1 |
0.5% |
|
Prefer not to say |
67 |
7% |
Answer |
Number |
Percentage |
|
Yes |
873 |
92% |
|
No |
8 |
1% |
|
Prefer not to say |
69 |
7% |
Age range |
Number |
Percentage |
|
16-19 |
2 |
0% |
|
20-24 |
8 |
1% |
|
25-29 |
23 |
2% |
|
30-34 |
33 |
3% |
|
35-39 |
61 |
6% |
|
40-44 |
39 |
4% |
|
45-49 |
51 |
5% |
|
50-54 |
78 |
8% |
|
55-59 |
68 |
7% |
|
60-64 |
116 |
12% |
|
Over 65 |
470 |
50% |
Religion |
Number |
Percentage |
|
Buddhist |
5 |
1% |
|
Christian |
554 |
58% |
|
Hindu |
1 |
0% |
|
Jewish |
3 |
0% |
|
Muslim |
20 |
2% |
|
Sikh |
0 |
0% |
|
No religion |
249 |
26% |
|
Decline |
81 |
9% |
|
Other |
37 |
4% |
Ethnicity, cultural or racial origin |
Number |
Percentage |
|
|
886 |
92% |
|
|
White – Irish |
7 |
1% |
|
|
White – Gypsy or Irish Traveller |
0 |
0% |
|
|
Any other White background – please describe below in the ‘Other’ section |
6 |
1% |
|
|
Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups – White and Black Caribbean |
2 |
0% |
|
|
Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups – White and Black African |
0 |
0% |
|
|
Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups – White and Asian |
3 |
0% |
|
|
Any other Mixed/Multiple ethnic background – please describe in the ‘Other’ section |
1 |
0% |
|
|
Asian/Asian British – Indian |
7 |
1% |
|
|
Asian/Asian British – Pakistani |
10 |
1% |
|
|
Asian/Asian British – Bangladeshi |
1 |
0% |
|
|
Asian/Asian British – Chinese |
1 |
0% |
|
|
Asian/Asian British – Any other Asian background |
0 |
0% |
|
|
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British – African |
0 |
0% |
|
|
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British – Caribbean |
0 |
0% |
|
|
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British – Any other Black/African/Caribbean background |
0 |
0% |
|
|
Other ethnic group – Arab |
3 |
0% |
|
|
Other |
34 |
4% |
Sexual Orientation |
Numbers |
Percentage |
|
Bi/bisexual |
26 |
3% |
|
Gay |
17 |
2% |
|
Lesbian |
7 |
1% |
|
Heterosexual/straight |
749 |
80% |
|
Other term |
5 |
0% |
|
Prefer not to say |
129 |
14% |
Disability |
Number |
Percentage |
|
Yes |
213 |
23% |
|
No |
646 |
69% |
|
Decline |
81 |
9% |
Channel |
Number |
Percentage |
|
Social media |
208 |
22% |
|
In the Know email |
662 |
70% |
|
Hot Topics |
3 |
0% |
|
Prevention Matters |
9 |
1% |
|
Protection Matters |
0 |
0% |
|
Media |
20 |
2% |
|
LFRS employee |
18 |
2% |
|
LFRS internal channels |
6 |
1% |
|
LFRS website |
19 |
2% |
|
Community meeting |
4 |
1% |